<h2>Our standard</h2><p>Every guide should answer a real reader question with original examples and current sources. Crypto trading can affect financial wellbeing, so an author must distinguish a venue rule from a general concept and explain material uncertainty.</p><h2>Authorship and review</h2><p>Pages identify their accountable author. The disclosed local Article Review Agent checks source quotations, current references, calculations, risk boundaries, reader value and editorial quality. An authenticated owner or administrator reviews its evidence in Admin > Blogs and makes the final publication decision. There is no independent human-review requirement; the automated agent is not a human expert, licensed adviser, trader or firsthand product user. Drafts stay out of public routes and search feeds until the agent passes and an admin approves them. No writer, credential, trading history or result is invented.</p><h2>Sources and corrections</h2><p>Primary venue, regulator and research sources are preferred. Article source lists state the publisher and access date. Readers can request a correction using the <a href=“https://www.stonkbuilder.com/contact/x” rel=“noopener noreferrer”>SuperQuant contact page</a>; material corrections are recorded with the updated review date.</p><h2>Use of AI</h2><p>A local language model assists with the review. Its output is checked against exact article and source quotations, fresh source fetches, arithmetic recomputation, and deterministic publication rules. The owner or administrator makes the final publication decision in Admin > Blogs. The model is not a licensed adviser, trader, human expert or firsthand product user; its approval is not a guarantee of factual accuracy or suitability.</p><h2>Independence</h2><p>SuperQuant may describe its own tools accurately. Tool descriptions are product information, not proof of strategy quality or suitability. We do not report hypothetical performance as a realized result or accept venue fees as evidence of independent review.</p>